Hewes Super Bowl Trophy
In: Updates
9 Feb 2011Participants,
Well, as soon as I thought we had taken care of the 400 poor souls who did not get to see the Super Bowl (even though they purchased legal tickets and fought through the nasty weather to cheer on their team last Sunday), I finally heard from Pete the Terp (was he hibernating under a shell?). Turns out that he was in Florida vacationing and visiting his parents during the Super Bowl.
So, in an email conversation with PTT, he indicated he had sent in his score before he left (the Tuesday before the BIG GAME). I looked for the obvious email from the HSBT website and could not find anything. Also perused my home and work inboxes and also deleted messages, hoping to find that elusive message that was sent while I was also on vacation the week fore the BIG GAME.
Nothing…
I asked PTT if he had kept a copy of the sent message and have not heard back from him yet.
Here is the scoop — he mentioned in his email that he thought he picked the Steelers to win, 20-17. I re-ran our scoring model under that assumption to see how it would potentially impact the final results of our competition. Fortunately (for some), PTT would have had the largest variance in the BIG GAME with that score and would have recorded his 2nd goose-egg of this year’s competition.
Applying the 20-17 score, here would be the final point totals and finishing place for the participants:
Questions:
I appreciate your feedback as PTT scours through his email files. I will let you know what happens, and PTT may be out of town until this weekend.
From its inception in 1989, the premier NFL Playoff football competition incorporates a dual-scoring system that rewards participants to not only pick the winning team, but also the game score with increasing significance every week
1 Response to For Pete (the Terp)’s Sake??
Greg the Great
February 10th, 2011 at 12:54 am
I would say, since it didn’t effect the main outcomes, to just disallow the score, unless there is indisputable evidence in the replay/email to overrule the initial calling. So..
1. Yes, its okay
2. Yes, whatever the replay/email evidence says, if it exists